Problem Statement
Potential History graduate students here at Clemson must go through the process of application to the program, a process about which information is available, but widely scattered. No singular source of information is available to candidates that could make the process easier. In order to rectify this, a document that amasses as much of the information regarding the process as is practical should be written, so that it may be distributed to interested students as an aid to the process.
Problem Section
A simple bit of investigation shows that there is information available on the History department’s website concerning the program. When one reads through the three pertinent pieces, the Guide to Graduate Study in History[1], Financial Aid[2], and Areas of Study[3], it becomes apparent that these bits of information are useful. But a close reading reveals many terms which are not addressed or defined within. The consequence is that the interested party must resort to hunting down information through other sources to begin piecing together an understanding of the process.
The next likely step for the inquisitive is the
Neither are more than references. They are not designed in such a fashion as to actively assist a graduate candidate, and force the individual to go through a good bit of back and forth to get what they need out of them. This is the point in which some of the associated frustration with the application process begins to become apparent.
In talking with graduate students of differing backgrounds and majors here, they mentioned among other things, that they wish they had known more about the GRE. This indicates that there information is not as accessible as it could be. Information is available in a link on the
While the prospective student's advisor may be equipped to answer questions not covered by one of these sources, this is still contingent on the advisor having the time to either meet with the student or respond to their queries through other channels. And if the prospective student is coming from another university, then this may pose even more of a problem, as their face to face time with an advisor is going to be limited by the distance they have to travel. In either case, the students do not have a tool in hand that they themselves can make use of to ease their application process.
That these issues exist can potentially lead to frustration on the part of candidates, which can lead to possibly fewer candidates than would otherwise apply. Fewer applicants will likely result in less funding for the program, and make it much more difficult to maintain the quality of the program, much less increase it. It is also quite conceivable that in navigating the maze of the application process that mistakes can be made, although how problematic those mistakes may be could vary. At the very least, it is a source of distraction and frustration during the applicant’s senior year at college. In any case, these issues bear addressing.
Solution
It is necessary then, that prospective graduate students have access to a document that will function as more than just a reference, but as a tool to help guide them through the process of application. The document, which will take the form of a manual, will incorporate not just the program guidelines laid out on the history website, but would also explain general requirements for graduate school at Clemson, the application process itself in detail (including the GRE), financial aid available for graduate students, and would include a series of useful aids for the student, such as a timeline for the process and relevant contact information.
Granted, there are things that relate to the application process which are not suitable for this document. Such things deal with the current politics of the department. This document is not to be a guide to ingratiating oneself to the applications committee.
Such things would be inappropriate for a text that advisors would hand out. In addition, it seems certain that an argument would be made that an attempt to navigate the peculiarities of politics in the history department is a necessary part of becoming a more mature historian, and putting out a guide would in some way diminish the quality of applicants. Rather this document is about the established and concrete portions of the process, the ones that ostensibly applicants are bound by. In other words, the manual is going to be “by the book.”
Qualifications
I believe myself qualified to take on this task for several reasons. First, I am a history undergraduate here at
Work Plan
to be updated and revised as needed
Week of October 8th
© Additional research is required to further understand needs of graduate candidates –to be completed within the week if possible
© When research is complete, begin process of choosing essential information for booklet
© Brainstorm useful features.
Week of October 15th
© Begin writing draft material for manual
© Begin taking photos for use in manual
Week of October 22rd
© Assessment of progress and work plan updates
© Continue on draft of manual
Week of October 29rd
© Begin formatting draft manual
Week of November 5th
© First draft of manual
Week of November 12th
© Revisions
Week of November 19th
© Draft Due
Week of November 26th
© Prepare final draft based on input
Week of December 3rd
© Presentation
[1] Guide to Graduate Study in History. (Last accessed, October 11, 2007)
[2] Financial Aid.
[3] Areas of Study.
[4]
[5] ETS: Educational Testing Services.
1 comment:
Steven,
I am sorry that I didn't leave my comment about our discussion in Thursday's class sooner. I didn't have your URL address on my list of our class URL addresses, but I just got it from Profesor H. so I have it now. :)
Like we talked about in class on Thursday, just make sure that you really emphasize why you think that your proposed documents are going to be more effective than what already exists, or, in other words, why you think your documents will work. I think this is a question that each one of our classmates needs to evaluate and ask themselves at this point in our projects.
I think your idea in creating a catalogue-type document for the history department is excellent! It's a lot like a "How To" manual, but not for dummies, for overwhelmed college students that are seeking a little bit of quick advice without the whole one-on-one conference-bit.
I think the idea of using a link on a webpage, or something like that, is still a good idea because it would be easily accessible for all students, no matter where they are. They could be overseas and still access the information that they need. A phamplet or manual of some sort would also work, but I like the idea of a web link better.
Be sure to focus on making your documents something that is different from what already exists, and better. I know it might take a lot of detail, because if the history department is anything like the english department, some of the most important things that students need to know lack the most important detail.
Good luck!
Post a Comment